It has been the jest of jokes for decades and is the focus of TV sitcoms. . . the dreaded in-law problem. No doubt many married couples deal with a negative in-law situation.
As a newly married couple living in the same city as both parents, we found ourselves torn between which parent to visit each Sunday. It was bad enough that I remember even "keeping score". "We spent 3 hours at your parents' house, we have to spend 3 hours at mine". It was a difficult way to start a marriage and try to build a relationship with each other. Unfortunately, my husband's family was more demanding and fed the competition. When holidays came, it was even more intense. We were torn between families and had no chance of creating our own traditions as a family.
Unfortunately, we did not follow the advice in the article Creating Healthy Ties with In-laws and Extended Families by James M. Harper and Susanne Frost Olsen. It said, "Often the relationship between families can be like a tug-of-war. . . it is important for both the husband and the wife not to be in the middle" (pg. 328).
The first task of a newly married couple is to separate from the families from which they grew up and create a strong marital identity. They might think of themselves as existing together within an invisible fence.
Since that experience, my husband and I are careful not to put demands on our married children. We let them decide where they want to spend the holidays and let them know they are always welcome, but they can choose what they want to do. It has been a blessing for all of us.
Conversely, my in-laws continue to be demanding of the family members which drives wedges in relationships and leads to less-satisfying outcomes. An example of this is the family reunion held every other year. My father-in-law sends a flood of emails urging all family members--clear down to the grand-children--that they need to plan ahead and be there. There is no justifiable reason to miss the reunion and everyone has plenty of time to plan ahead. The wording he uses, which lacks any indication family members have the ability to choose, creates a push-back and rebelliousness. One of my sons refuses to attend just because of that.
He is an elderly man who wants more than anything for all of his family to be together. It is a righteous desire. If he changed his methods from pressuring everyone to honestly expressing his love for each family member and his desire to see all of them while allowing their ability to choose, many more would make the concerted effort to attend, which would fulfill my father-in-law's desire.
Harper and Olsen said, "The good news is that when parents-in-law understand inclusion and exclusion issues, the necessity of monitoring and managing their need for control, the loyalty tugs, and the importance of helping a new couple establish a solid marriage boundary, in-law relationships are improved" (pg. 333).
Families should strive for closeness instead of enmeshment. Enmeshment happens when families feel like they always have to be together and there is confusing about loyalty and feelings. Children might be afraid of offending parents. Closeness is different and parents and children both feel secure about their relationship with each other. It involves emotional closeness, but parents feel comfortable staying on their side of the fence. Having a close relationship without enmeshment concerns is the best scenario for families.












